Re: [security-services] Migrating appropriate content from the TCwiki to SAML XML.org

[Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>]

I tend to see it the same way.  Most actual content should probably go on
xml.org and the oasis wiki should be reserved for our own work in progress
type content.  Document progress and status, attestations, and things of
that nature belong on the oasis wiki.  Informational and outreach type
content belongs on the xml.org wiki.  For example,
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SAMLV1 seems like a good candidate to
move to xml.org.   


On 1/29/08 8:49 AM, "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:

>> I realize that there are a variety of opinions on the two wiki's and I
> feel
>> most of the comments and concerns are quite valid.  However, and maybe I'm
>> just being naïve here, I think that if we use the guidelines Carol
> mentions
>> here, it's not unreasonable to have, use and maintain the two.  I'll add
> an
>> element to the agenda to discuss this (again) tomorrow.
> 
> I don't have a problem with that, but the guidelines as stated create in my
> mind a strong presumption that most content would be at saml.xml.org and
> only TC work items would need to be left on the OASIS wiki. Basically
> anything where open editing would contaminate TC work.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
>