Re: [security-services] comments re sstc-saml-holder-of-key-browser-sso-draft-07

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Nate Klingenstein <ndk@internet2.edu> wrote:
>
>> The SAML wiki provides a fairly good version history (or at least it
>> contains the information required to construct one easily).
>
> Maybe pointing at the Wiki would be better, then.

That's a different approach but I don't see why not.  What's the best
way to sneak this link into the document, I wonder?

> It lacks my comments that
> I've been adding with revisions, but those would only take a few moments to
> copy over.

That would be an advantage over an inline version history, in fact.

Thanks,
Tom