RE: [security-services] PE78: Reassignment of persistent identifiers

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> Well, MUST NOT is a stretch for an erratum (as pointed out by Eve on
> the call), and SHOULD NOT is not all that useful IMO, so perhaps a new
> format is needed, yes.

Without disagreeing, a MUST NOT is fine in an errata if the spec meant to
say that and just didn't. Then you ask for input as to whether anybody
implemented or deployed based on assuming it wasn't a MUST NOT, and if not,
you're good to go. We've done it before.

-- Scott