[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: question on MNI request for SP Lite/IdP Lite
For this year’s Liberty SAML IOP event, we are adding
a new error test case for SP Lite and IdP Lite applications. Per the SAML
conformance specification, SP Lite and IdP Lite MUST NOT support Name ID
management messaging and functionality. As some of the vendor products allow
their applications to be switched from SP to SP Lite mode (same with IdP and
IdP Lite), we need to fully test this “switch” and verify they are
properly acting in the SP Lite/IdP Lite mode. To do this, we are expanding the error test tool. Once the ETT
has established a SSO with the SP Lite/IdP Lite with a persistent name ID, we
plan on generating a MNIRequest attempting to change the name ID. I have two
questions which I would like feedback from SSTC on… 1. When a SP Lite/IdP Lite receives a MNIRequest, what should
be their proper response? Ignore the request? Generate an error <Status> response?
Either is acceptable? 2. After generating the MNIRequest, I planned on verifying
the SP Lite/IdP Lite did not accept the name ID change by sending a
LogoutRequest using the new name ID from the MNIRequest message and looking for
the error <Status> response that the SP Lite/IdP Lite does not recognize the
principal. Then, send the LogoutRequest using the original name ID from the
Response message and verifying principal is successfully logged out. Does this
sound like a reasonable test scenario? Thanks. Kyle Meadors Drummond Group Inc. Principal, Test Process (w) 615-212-0826 (c) 817-709-1627 kyle@drummondgroup.com |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]