Re: [security-services] Potential implications for the AssuranceAuthn Context Profile doc?

["RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>]

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Paul Madsen wrote:

> Colin, yes I expect that the authn context piece of the LOA profile 
> will, notwithstanding this Wiki page that suggests a different model, 
> give ENISA what they need by standardizing how to define auth context 
> classes against LOA documentation

I'm not seeing what you're seeing.  Proposal 3 on the wiki page suggests:

  it could have a placeholder for links to level schemes and, perhaps using
  Context Classes (e.g. EU Level 1, EU Level 2)

Isn't that what our doc does?

I can't tell what the paper is proposing.

In any case the ENISA group should certainly review the TC draft.

  - RL "Bob"

> this view would appear to be confirmed by this paper
> 
>  http://www.enisa.europa.eu/doc/pdf/deliverables/enisa_IDABC_SAML.pdf
> 
> paul
> 
> Colin Wallis wrote:
>
>       Greetings all
>
>        
>
>       I was sent this link in relation to some ITU-T engagement I'm
>       having at the moment.
>
>        
> 
> http://wiki.enisa.europa.eu/index.php?title=Authentication_Interoperability
>        
>
>       I don't recall engagement from Giles's team since, what, late
>       last year?
>
>        
>
>       Cheers
>
>       Colin
>
>        
>
>        
>
>        
> 
> 
>