[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] SHA-256 for SAML?
RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote on 2009-08-02: > >> That language should have been moved into conformance, it's pretty much >> an errata, I would say. It's not even useful for conformance, since it's >> a SHOULD, so it probably ought to just be yanked. > > OK, so there's a proposed erratum, also the same text in the conformance > doc should be removed as you note. You mean metadata? Yes, I'll create a PE so we can approve it next call. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]