Re: [security-services] Groups - Change Notify Protocol 02 (saml-2.0-notify-draft-02.zip) uploaded

[Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>]

Any reason to think we need to add qualifiers to the RetireSubject notification element?  

I think parties could agree on a single action definition in a SLA. But do we foresee a requirement to signal different types of retirements in a single SLA?

Phil
phil.hunt@oracle.com




On 2010-09-21, at 1:39 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

>> From SPMLv2 :
>> 
>> The Suspend Capability defines three operations: suspend, resume and
> active.
>> .         The suspend operation disables an object (immediately or on
>> a specified date).
>> .         The resume operation re-enables an object (immediately or on
>> a specified date).
>> .         The active operation tests whether an object is currently
>> suspended.
> 
> I guess if the contract says that you don't agree to suspend something if
> you don't intend to actually do so, that's part of the signaling in response
> to the operation? In SAML, we definitely have avoided any dictates to
> parties about state cleanup.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>