[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] CD02 of Kerberos Web Browser SSO profile uploaded
Thanks Chet, I will follow the steps that you have provided. cheers, /thomas/ __________________________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: Chet Ensign [mailto:chet.ensign@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 4:16 PM > To: Cantor, Scott > Cc: Thomas Hardjono; SAML; Nate Klingenstein; Josh Howlett > Subject: Re: [security-services] CD02 of Kerberos Web Browser SSO > profile uploaded > > Hi all, > > Scott is correct. The process has sped up quite a bit though so it > won't take as long as in the past. > > To be specific, Section 3, Approval Process of the TC Process says, > "Standards Track Work Products progress as follows: Committee > Specification Draft, Committee Specification Public Review Draft, > Committee Specification... Each of the progressions above must begin > with step 1, and no step may be skipped." > > So the steps to take now are: > > 1. Upload the WD ZIP file with all the component parts that make up the > specification to Kavi. In your meeting motions, please approve it as > SAML V2.0 Kerberos Attribute Profile Version 1.0 Working Draft 02 and > include the Kavi link. Make two motions - one to approve Working Draft > 02 as a Committee Specification Draft and one to approve sending the > Committee Specification Draft out for public review. For example, > motion language like: > > "Do TC members approve SAML V2.0 Kerberos Attribute Profile Version > 1.0 Working Draft 02 (located in <kavi link > stuff>sstc-saml-kerberos-browser-sso-wd-02.zip) as Committee > Specification Draft 02? > > Do TC members approve submitting Committee Specification Draft 02 for > 15 day public review?" > > will do the job just fine. > > 2. Because the previous ticket was to create the CS, please enter new > tickets for the CSD and CSPRD at http://www.oasis- > open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/committee-specification-draft- > creation-upload-request > and http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/15-day- > committee-specification-draft-public-review-request > . The JIRA queue is down to where it ought to be - these tickets will > be turned around and the PR started within 3 days max. > > 3. After the PR completes and assuming no comments received, reapprove > voting on the Committee Spec Draft as a Committee Specification and > enter a ticket for me at http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin- > requests/committee-specification-ballot-request. > I will get that ballot started and meanwhile, we will get everything > ready for the CS to upload quickly. > > Thanks & let me know if you have any questions about any of the > above... > > /chet > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> > wrote: > > On 11/21/11 11:39 AM, "Thomas Hardjono" <hardjono@MIT.EDU> wrote: > >> > >>Apologies for my misunderstanding -- as this is my first time going > >>from CS all the way back to WD :) > >> > >>I had assumed I needed to back as far as CD only. I will rename the > >>doc to be WD again. > > > > You can check with Chet, but AFAIK there are no special dispensations > > to avoid steps anymore to avoid making TC-admin responsible for > > judgement calls about document changes. > > > > -- Scott > > > > > > > > -- > > /chet > ---------------- > Chet Ensign > Director of Standards Development and TC Administration > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > http://www.oasis-open.org > > Primary: +1 973-378-3472 > Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 > > Follow OASIS on: > LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen > Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen > Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]