[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Groups - Draft Webinar on SAML 2.1 Plans uploaded
I think a big drawback is that these sorts of test usually just test to see if one can eventually get product A to talk to product B. They do not, as far as I can tell, test for spec compliance. Both in my professional consulting and in my work with Shibboleth I have encountered a number of impls (especially commercial ones) that simply are not standards compliant. This invariablly leads to a significant amount of consternation and comments of how "this SAML stuff" is crap. On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote: > On 7/11/12 12:54 PM, "Chad La Joie" <lajoie@itumi.biz> wrote: > >>Posting on behalf of Tim... >> >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>From: Timothy Bennett <timothy@drummondgroup.com> >> >>Should there be a slide that markets the interoperbility test that >>Kantara sponsors and the list of SAML products that are certified as >>interoperable? > > I'm...unenthused. The kindest that could be said is that the testing does > not appear to reflect the feature set that my community cares about, or > perhaps that if your domain is very small deployments with static feature > sets, the testing is perhaps representative. > > -- Scott > -- Chad La Joie www.itumi.biz trusted identities, delivered
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]