[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] New Templates for SAML 2.1
On 1/21/14, 7:28 PM, "La Joie, Chad" <Chad.LaJoie@covisint.com> wrote:I'm maybe in the minority, but still feel like having foundational
>
>First question: given our new focus on having these thematic documents
>be, in some regards, "the starting point", should they come immediately
>after the overview in our part list (actual titles to be determined
>later)?
documents earlier is better, with the profiles at the end.
I do.
>Second question: we discussed the possibility of rolling security
>considerations into the various thematic documents. Do we still think
>that's a good idea?
I think we ought to look at conformance statements covering the profiles
>Last question: we talked before about the general inadequacy of the
>conformance documentation. Should we try and roll that in to the
>thematic documents?
individually, but not try and build overarching conformance classes that
cover the standard as a whole into those documents.
But I don't know what OASIS actually allows or requires these days.
-- Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]