security-services message

Subject: Re: W3C WG vs SAML ?? Fwd: [security-services] Official statement to W3C WG about impact on SAML?

From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>, âSAML âTC â <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>, Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@mit.edu>, Hal Lockhart <harold.w.lochhart@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:07:26 +0000

> Chet's out for a few days on holiday. Scott C, it seems to me that we could offer
> a comment. Better if it has the general assent of this TC. Are those who are
> subscribed here comfortable with Scott's take, if phrased politely - breaks
> both SAML and OpenID?

Given how infrequently the TC meets, is there any appetite to have OASIS issue just a simple "feel good" statement to the W3C saying "Please take existing usage of SAML (and OpenID) into account, understanding that the work to migrate to new solutions would take many years..."

Thanks,
-- Scott