[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Input to use case meeting
Hi Nigel! > Hi Anders, > I think you have done a reasonable job of describing the messages > that are exchanged, if purple(tm) was used to implement case #1 > in the S2ML document. If I understand correctly you are saying > it is possible to build the scenario with less > pre-configuration than is currently allowed or implied by > the S2ML draft. That is indeed exactly what we addressing. > Do you have any views on the minimum configuration > requirements that you could articulate to the list? Not really, but the scheme presented allows configuration to be only one URL and one trust (PKC) assigment per "e-relation". This is what I would call the "maximum" acceptable configuration requirement. However, I do not believe that this is enough. Purple(tm) is currently going through iterations that allows additional messages supporting creation, deletion, and quering of partnerships using this scheme. I.e. these processes could be very nicely integrated in business systems so they can (with a few exceptions) be performed by business administrators instead of by system administrators and consultants. And in an entirely interoperable way supporting potentially millions of interconnected partners. To achieve that, these processes must be standardized. Now, this is of course involves more than just "tweaking" some parameters! Regards Anders Rundgren
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC