[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Notion of session
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 George_Robert_Blakley_III@tivoli.com wrote: > On the call today we discussed whether the specification ought to > include a notion of session. > > Here's my cut at some text capturing this issue: I like both Bob B's characterization of the issue and his recommendations, in particular: > Given all this, I would strongly prefer that we NOT include (2) (a) in > our scope. I think his points (assuming we are able to achieve consensus on them) begin to answer the questions I put to the main list on Jan 29 about the relationship of OSSML to other protocols. That is, to use OSSML assertions a protocol has to have its own facilities for session management, secure binding of protocol elements, etc; we won't be providing these. - RL "Bob"
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC