[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Marlena's vote on 12
ISSUE:[UC-12-01:Confidentiality] b) C&I protection is optional (but encouraged). ------------------------------------------------------------------ ISSUE: [UC-12-02:ConfidentialMessages] c) C&I protection shall be specified both within the SAML message format and within protocol bindings. Deployments can choose the appropriate solution. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ISSUE:[UC-12-03:EncryptionNow] a) Integrity protection shall use XML DSIG, and confidentiality protection shall not be available. Comment: I agree with Nigel: the protocol binding can/should provide for confidentiality for the time being. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ISSUE:[UC-12-04:EncryptionLater] When the XML Encryption standard is published: b) SAML shall be revised to use XML Encryption.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC