RE: [soa-eerp] I053: BQos - Conformance Issues 2

["eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn" <eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn>]

New working Draft WD06 uploaded at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=33226 and it
added new conformance paragraph on Line # 447-457.   

This issue can be closed.   


Original Message:
-----------------
From: eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:20:02 -0400
To: wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com, soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [soa-eerp] I053: BQos - Conformance Issues 2


Propose to add the following text to close this issue: 

The minimum set of information exchange for bQoS that would allow
conforming applications to exchange information and satisfy the conformance
should at least to have /bqos:BQoS/bqos:BQoSPrice/bqos:Price/bqos:Amount
element, like this: 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<BQoS xmlns="http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/bqos/200903";>
	<BQoSPrice>
		<Price>
			<Amount currencyID="USD">0.0</Amount>
		</Price>
	</BQoSPrice>
</BQoS> 


Interoperability issue has been addressed on issue # I045. 



Original Message:
-----------------
From: eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:29:30 -0400
To: wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com, soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-eerp] I053: BQos - Conformance Issues 2


Issue # I053

For BQoS Spec only 

Related issues: I045, I054 and I055


Original Message:
-----------------
From: William Cox wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:10:20 -0400
To: soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-eerp] NEW Issue: Conformance Issues 2


PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL THE 
ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.

The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol: bqos rating sla

Artifact: spec

Type: design

Title: Conformance Issues 2

Description:

This issue applies to

BusinessQualityOfService-v1.0-spec-wd04.pdf
BusinessRating-v1.0-spec-wd05.pdf
BusinessServiceLevelAgreement-v1.0-spec-wd04.pdf

Consider whether empty instances would allow conforming applications to 
exchange information and satisfy the conformance section.

Many of the items are zero or one, or otherwise are not required.

Analysis of the minimal set of exchanged information should be done to 
evaluate the quality of the conformance section.

Interoperability testing would reveal these issues, when done.

Related issues:

Unrecognized Attributes and Extensibility
Conformance Issues 1

Proposed Resolution:

Conduct analysis as described.

Plan interoperability testing for the future.

bill cox
--
*William Cox*
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 
<mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail