RE: Your Proposed Dispositions

["Peter F Brown" <peter@justbrown.net>]

Don:
Following the meeting call, I made a few changes myself, and cleaned up some
of the proposals.

What I'd like to suggest as a process, is the following (and I copy the
other editors in on this too):

- I send these PDs to the original movers or contributors for their comment,
suggested compromise wording, etc. (TC list in copy for information);
- If we achieve a consensus among the movers, I'll submit these to you
formally;
- If any of them objects to the PD, then it's thrown back to the list for
debate, the results of which I'd then encapsulate at another round

What do you think? It might sound like an extra layer of bureaucracy but I'm
a committee man at heart: something should be tabled as a formal proposal
only when it's mature and ready for a vote and (where there is serious
difference of opinion) the lines are clear...

-Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] 
Sent: 02 June 2005 02:39
To: Peter F Brown
Subject: Your Proposed Dispositions

Peter

Please look over the attached issues list and let me know if I have
represented your Proposed Dispositions correctly.  When I get your ok, I
will release it to the list.

N.B. There was no PD in 07-29 therefore I didn't do anything for this issue.

Don

--
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
http://flintsecurity.com