[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions
Yes - we have to move on. Duane Don Flinn wrote: >Fellow Editors > >If you have a PD and the creator of the issue has not responded to you >either - >i) Follow Duane's recommendation >or >ii) If you decide that the issue is with merit and have a PD, please >submit it adding Duane's caveat, modified as "Additional clarification >was requested; no response received; Editors Proposed Disposition" > >Do you agree with this Duane? > >Don > >On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:36 -0700, Duane Nickull wrote: > > >>Hello Wes: >> >>He is not on vacation and if he (or any other commenter) does not >>respond by CoB today, I would recommend simply replying to the comment with >> >>"Additional clarification was requested; no response received. Comment >>tabled" >> >>Unless there is a clear way to address it without the clarification. To >>be fair, perhaps you could ping him today with this information to >>ensure he is aware that unless he provides the input the comment is >>subject to slip. >> >>He is always free to re-submit the comments in the next round. >> >>In time for the next conference call, I would like to suggest that we >>compose a list of comment dispositions to work through as a TC and allow >>people in advance to look at this. perhaps we can get a new draft done >>very soon. >> >>Also - what is the proposed disposition of Gregory's comment regarding >>figure 2-1 being too vacuous? IMO - this precedes all other >>dispositions since it impacts them. >> >>Duane >> >>McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca wrote: >> >> >> >>>I also posed some questions to Joe. >>> >>>He must be on vacation. >>> >>>Wes >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] >>>Sent: June 8, 2005 11:44 AM >>>To: Don Flinn >>>Cc: soa-rm-editors >>>Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] Proposed Dispositions >>> >>>I thought that the process involved first of all discussing the issue >>>with the raiser of the issue. >>> >>>I have not submitted my dispositions because I have not had any >>>response yet from Joe. >>>Frank >>> >>>On Jun 8, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Don Flinn wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi Fellow Editors >>>> >>>>So far I have received Proposed Dispositions (PDs) from Peter Brown, >>>>John Harby and Don Flinn. I'm looking for an onslaught of PDs >>>>today as >>>>this is our target date. >>>> >>>>If your PD is short (reasonable size for a Excel cell) send it with >>>>the >>>>issue number. If the PD is lengthy upload an email containing the >>>>PD to >>>>Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page. I >>>>will then put a hyperlink to your email in the appropriate PD cell. >>>>Include the issue number in the email. See John Harby's PD in the >>>>Draft >>>>07 folder for an example. >>>> >>>>If you have any question or problems please contact me. >>>> >>>>Don >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Don Flinn >>>>President, Flint Security LLC >>>>Tel: 781-856-7230 >>>>Fax: 781-631-7693 >>>>e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu >>>>http://flintsecurity.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]