[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] wd-soa-rm-10ED.pdf
No I don't fully agree with this. 3.1 introduced the model, section 2 introduces SOA -- they are different. However, 3.1 could stand some redaction... Frank On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Ken Laskey wrote: > On a quick look, one thing I noticed was we added Section 2 but > also retained Section 3.1. Now it really seems redundant. I will > try to indicate some specific edits but my initial suggestion is to > remove Section 3.1 and promote section 3.2 to 3. Having not read > the latest, I'm not sure if Sections 3.3-3.6 stay with a revised > Section 3 or become a new Section 4. > > Other opinions welcome. > > Ken > > On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:48 AM, Matt MacKenzie wrote: > >> Team: >> >> Here is the Draft 10 candidate. If there is agreement of this >> team, I >> will knock off the ED and post it to the main list. >> >> Please, send in your votes. If there is a no, deliver it with at >> least >> one proposed change :-) >> >> -Matt >> <wd-soa-rm-10ED.pdf> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > Ken Laskey > MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 > 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 > McLean VA 22102-7508 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]