[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: SOA-RM v10 Proof-reading - Work time!
I am
sure I missed few
hopefully this helps.
Thanks,
/Prasanta
OK, let's rollPeter
From: Brown, Al [mailto:abrown@filenet.com]
Sent: 02 November 2005 18:42
To: prasanta behera; peter@justbrown.net
Cc: soa-rm-editors
Subject: RE: SOA-RM v10 Proof-reading - Work time!That is fine with me. I can have a draft back with comments by Friday. -Al
From: prasanta behera [mailto:pkb.prasanta@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:40 AM
To: peter@justbrown.net
Cc: Brown, Al; soa-rm-editors
Subject: Re: SOA-RM v10 Proof-reading - Work time!
Peter,
I can do it. I can do section 1.0 - 3.2. If Al can look at 3.3->5 and you the rest, we will be in a good shape.
Thanks,
/PrasantaOn 11/2/05, Peter F Brown < peter@justbrown.net> wrote:
Prasanta, Al:
Following today's TC conf call, the time has come for us to do a proof-reading of the new v10ED version before release to the list and the whole TC (copy attached).
We are looking for:
- grammatical, typo and formatting errors;
- inconsistencies in wording at different points in the text;
- ambiguity about intended meaning;
Could you indicate:
- whether you can contribute in a short time frame;
- which section(s) you would prefer to tackle *in detail* (we will all three of us need to look through the whole text to assess consistency).
I will in any case look at the Glossary and consistency with rest of text as part of my responsibility for that section.
I would hope that we could turn this around by the end of the weekend so that Matt can post to list next Monday.
Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]