service execution context

["Poulin, Michael" <Michael.Poulin@uk.fid-intl.com>]

Folks,

I have another question (which is, probably, not the right time to ask since the period of comments for 0.2 version is closed... but I will try):

I've just realised that the RA interprets 'service execution context' from RM as "Within the RM, the execution context stood for all the aspects of an information system that are needed to facilitate interaction. A large part of the goals of the Reference Architecture is to show how interaction is realized". Plus, "Descriptions of the provider and consumer are the essential building blocks for establishing the execution context of an interaction." That is, it is a communication context.

In another place: "The execution context can be thought of as a series of answers to the questions of why would the participants be willing to interact and whether such interaction is possible", i.e. one can assume that the context may include business conditions/context as a factor of willingness to interact. This corresponds to the references to the policies in the RM's definition (policies, which may apply as to the communication as to the execution on the provider side and be agreed in the Service Contract).

I have read the RM's definition of the execution context as both - information AND business context of execution of the service rather than just communication information system context. For example, assume we have a service for calculating a fund price. We have corporate divisions in the US and in the UK working with different funds but in the same fund category. Besides different policies, the calculation method is different (in the business definition) in the US and the UK. That is, the service execution context from business perspective is different. So, before reusing the service even in the same information infrastructure, it is better to, at least, re-test it even if no one bit of its implementation is changed.

I think we have to clear state what is meant by  the service execution context in the RA. 

Cheers,

Michael Poulin

Head of Business Analysis and Web Architecture

Senior Manager, Web Delivery

Fidelity Investments International

' +44-173-783-6038
* michael.poulin@uk.fid-intl.com
8 http://www.fidelity.co.uk/

Important: Fidelity Investments International (Reg. No.1448245), Fidelity Investment Services Limited (Reg. No. 2016555), Fidelity Pensions Management (Reg. No. 2015142) and Financial Administration Services Limited (Reg. No. 1629709, a Fidelity Group company) are all registered in England and Wales, are authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority and have their registered offices at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on products and does not give investment advice to private clients based on individual circumstances. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be subject to our monitoring procedures. Direct link to Fidelity’s website - http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html