[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] roles and the social structure
As far as the RBAC/ABAC question, there are lots of cases in human orgs where the specific attributes of someone filling a role come after the role designation itself. You expect that a security officer be able to deal with security related issues, even if a specific issue had not been conceived of beforehand. There are also cases where the role designation is an after the fact summarization of the specifics. My intention for the skill/qualification was to support the ability pov. I think that there are cases where qualification is of the essence: you cannot legally be a truck driver if you have not passed the driving test. (I guess the actual condition is more closely defined but the general idea is there.) So, I am in favor of finding a way of expressing the correct conditions; and if the 'requires' relationship is too strong then we can modify that. Frank On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Ken Laskey wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]