[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] An epiphany
Our strongest semantic tie in the RA is section 3.1.2 Communication as Joint Action as defined in Figure 7. We definitely need a semantic tie in the RA. I think Section 3.1.3, Using Communication for Service Action, will make most people scratch their head and wonder what it is for. I am guessing the epiphany may have had something to do with Figure 8 when defining capability action and message action. The "Counts as" definition states: "'Counts as' is a relationship between two systems in which one action, event or concept in one system can be understood as another action, event or concept in another system." This seems somewhat equivalent to "Semantic Engagement" in Figure 7, minus Content where Content is the message for the purpose of the RA. I see message as being figurative for whatever is exchanged during a communicative action. Is Sociology the answer to SOA? Danny
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]