[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] RE: Service & Capability
Yup. Cheers, Rex At 10:07 AM -0800 1/30/09, Estefan, Jeff A wrote: >Hi Jim, > >We never really fully defined "capability" in >the RM. Instead, we took the approach that it >meant more or less the "ability to do >something." A little vague admittedly, but >certainly OK from an abstract RM perspective. > >People usually associate doing something with >functionality; hence, capability and >functionality are often used synonymously when >talking about services. In my opinion, >capability goes beyond just the ability to do >something (i.e., functionality) but also how an >offering (e.g., service) performs that >capability; in other words, its quality >attributes. And both (functionality and quality >attributes) should be part of that offering's >advertised description. If not, how do I as a >consumer decide whether or not the offering is >going to meet my needs? > >The distinction between capability and real >world effect was essentially taken from the >perspective that the former is an a priori >notion (i.e., what the service can do or is >suppose to be able to do prior to invocation) >and the result of invoking the service to >realize the capability. The latter we refer to, >of course, as real world effect. > >Clearly, a real world effect cannot occur unless >there is some action or set of actions performed >by an initiator (consumer) and an action or set >of actions performed by the receiver (service). >This is why we introduced the concept of "joint >action" in the RA. In other words, there has to >be a speaker and a listener in order for >something to happen (i.e., real world effect to >occur). > >You do raise a good point between the two uses >in 4.3.2 and 3.3.1 that we would should try and >do a better job of aligning. Neither statement >is really wrong per se, it's just that it would >be better if we could be a little more clarity >on the relationship between action (or joint >action), capabilities, and real world effect as >you've suggested. Something we should take the >action to resolve before the next public review >draft. > >Cheers > > - Jeff -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]