[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] My takeway (while listening in to another telecom)
Cool, James, Thanks. That had me slightly worried, but this clears that up. Cheers. Rex At 9:08 AM -0400 6/25/09, James Odell wrote: >Rex, > >Regarding association classes, they are "bidirectional" because -- deeper >down -- an association class is a class that is associated with two other >classes in a specific manner. See attached ppt. > >-Jim > >On 6/24/09 3:24 PM, "Rex Brooks" indited: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I shouldn't say I'm not going to do something when my next task is to >> listen into another meeting (and a looooong one) where I don't have >> to participate much. So I have attached my takeaway from today's >> meeting for the Trust and Risk in Willingness diagram. If EA allows a >> bi-directional Association Class, I couldn't find out how to do it, >> however, in practice both Trust and Risk should go in both >> directions, or you can just think of the actors as swapping >> positions. However, in any case, I think we should make their >> definitions as close to identical as we can as opposite Association >> Classes. >> >> Now: >> >> Trust: Trust is an actor's private perception of the commitment >> another actor has to a goal together with an identifiable set of real >> world effects associated with that goal. >> >> Risk: Risk an an actor's private perception that another actor's >> actions will impede fulfillment of the first actor's objectives. >> >> At a minimum I think Risk should say that "Risk is an actor's private >> perception that another actor's action and other factors will impede >> fulfillment of the first actor's objectives. >> >> What I suggest: Trust is an actor's private perception that another >> actor's actions and other factors will aid fulfillment of the first >> actor's objectives. >> >> I added other factors because different external and internal factors >> may apply between Trust and Risk and are part of the assessment of >> how well another actor's action will effect attaining the Desired >> Real World Effect. >> >> I chose the Risk definition to make them identical just because it >> was shorter and more terse and commitment is, IMO just another >> factor, a big one, but just one of many. >> >> So, In light of both Ken's prior effort and Danny's I think we are at >> least getting honded down. >> >> Cheers, >> Rex >> > > >Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Willingness-association.pptx >(PPTX/PPT3) (017897C9) >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]