Re: [soa-rm-ra] Fwd: DM2 Soa Modeling - SoaML Perspective working meeting

[Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>]

I spent a fair amount of time talking with Cory about what was joint action we cared about vs. single action.  Was it always joint action?  Was single action just a degenerate or failed case, e.g. I sent a message to you but you didn't receive it (by failure or due to refusal).  Cory also feels that the Joint Action concept provides something that would be missing otherwise but our discussion didn't clearly identify what that is.

Anyway, first PR2 and then we come up with and stick to a plan for running this to ground.

Ken

On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Thornton, Danny R (IS) wrote:

No drowning that cat now! It's out of the bag and running free.

---

From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 6:48 PM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org RA
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Fwd: DM2 Soa Modeling - SoaML Perspective working meeting

I attended a meeting on the DoDAF metamodel (DM2) and Cory Casanave presented this brief showing soaML modeling.  Some of the latter stuff still in the discussion phase has to do with this weird thing called Joint Action.  Take a look and consider how it relates to the RA concept.

Ken

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934

7515 Colshire Drive                         fax:       703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508