Re: [soa-rm] interesting article - relevant to services and data modelaspects of our RM

[Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>]

Define "relevant".
-Matt

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> I found this passage toward the end (3rd par. from bottom) perplexing 
> in terms of where he was leading - it follows the discussion of using 
> RSS and REST:
>
> "In fact, this low-tech approach is so appealing that many people are 
> now discounting the WS-* stack. That’s understandable and in many 
> cases valid. While we argue about which WS-* standards will stick to 
> the wall, a set of key capabilities is emerging. Broadly speaking, 
> WS-* pushes aspects of data communication -- security, asynchrony, 
> reliability, routing, and proxying -- up into the application layer 
> where we can reason about these things as businesspeople rather than 
> wrestle with them as network plumbers."
>
> The first 3 sentences seem to support the notion of using RSS and REST 
> as alternatives to the WS-* stack (I see the basic point, but there 
> are aspects, such as security, that I believe he is discounting and 
> should not). But then, starting with "Broadly speaking,", he seems to 
> be a fan of WS-*.
>
> Does anyone see this differently?
>
> Joe
>
> Joseph Chiusano
>
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com <http://www.boozallen.com/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> *Sent:* Tue 5/3/2005 3:16 PM
> *To:* SOA-RM
> *Subject:* [soa-rm] interesting article - relevant to services and 
> data model aspects of our RM
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/03/11/11FEstateofarch5_1.html
>
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
> Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - 
> http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
> ***********
>