Re: [soa-rm] process for responding to issues?

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Ken:

The process itself is a bit vague, however the gist of it is that we 
must discuss each issue.  We can pre-discuss issues via email in advance 
of teleconferences.  There is simply not enough time to leave all 
discussions until conference calls. To do this effectively, we do need 
to set up a system.  I suggest the following:

The header of the email of the issue we wish to discuss is

[soa-rm] [ISSUE #] title

Of course - when you first compose the email, you do not have to type in 
the "[soa-rm]".  Kavi does that for you.

The "[ISSUE #]" should reflect the issue numbers on the spread sheet.  
Use the issue ID number Matt set up.

The title need to be abstracted from the comments log. It probably makes 
sense to use the "title" from the excel spreadsheet.

I will send out an example in a few seconds.

Duane


Ken Laskey wrote:

> When issues are published, is there a process for the editors to  
> respond.  Is there an expected timeframe for a response?
>
> I could see standard responses as
>
> - I agree and will attempt sufficient modifications
> - I don't understand your comment
> - No, that is really what I meant to say
>
> How do you want to handle?
>
> Ken
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> ------------------
> Ken Laskey
> MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
> 7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
> McLean VA 22102-7508
>
>

-- 
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical Committee - 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********