RE: [soa-rm] A new approach

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

I believe we're already effectively doing that, and that we're in the
midst of your step 4.

Not to dwell on the past, but we could have taken the approach from the
very beginning of building something incrementally toward SOA, rather
than constructing something quickly and then having to go back and forth
on whether or not it was really SOA. I think this may have been a much
more effective "plan up front" process.

But somehow we wound up at the same place anyway - so it all worked out.
Plus we had the opportunity to bring some key issues to the surface in
the meantime. So perhaps the approach we used was really the best
afterall.

And here we are, moving forward.

Joe

Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca 
> [mailto:McGregor.Wesley@tbs-sct.gc.ca] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:32 AM
> To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [soa-rm] A new approach
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I agree with Sally's email completely.
> 
> I was thinking of a slightly different approach to the 
> consensus problem.
> 
> Why can we not start with a single concept like service and 
> add more concepts as we progress with consensus being reached 
> on a continual basis.
> 
> 1. Service
> 2. Service + Service Description
> 3. Service + Service Description + relationships between them 
> 4. Service + Service Description + relationships between them 
> + policy 5. ...
> 
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Wes
> 
>