[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] New Name of Current Spec (Was RE: [soa-rm] Groups - SOA RM Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005 (Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005[1].doc) uploaded)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:47 AM > To: Chiusano Joseph > Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] New Name of Current Spec (Was RE: > [soa-rm] Groups - SOA RM Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005 > (Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005[1].doc) uploaded) > > Joe: > I think that you misread the result of the call yesterday. Please support - what was your read? Why was mine different? > I also think that it is less than productive to focus on > the idea of there being two 'camps'. Understood - no one can be wrong about this. I will respectfully choose to differ on that - and if there indeed are two "camps" within a group, I believe it is highly productive to recognize their existence and to try and work toward a solution that best satisfies both of those camps. Which is what I believe we have done given yesterday's call. Joe Joseph Chiusano Booz Allen Hamilton Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > I have had a fair amount of experience in participating in > standards activities. One thing that has been driven home to > me many times is that no one person has 'the whole picture' > when they go in to a process. Anyone who feels otherwise > (i.e., that they know everything and it is up to the rest to > catch up and agree) is just naive. > There is often a significant amount of mutual education in > a group like ours: of people being educated about a topic > that they thought they already knew. In this particular case, > there is (IMO) a genuine difficulty about the nature of a > reference model. There is also some inevitable to-ing and > fro-ing over the scope. > I suggest that we trust the process and work towards a > single understanding of what we are trying to do. > > Frank > > On Jun 2, 2005, at 6:32 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > Thanks Sally. My impression was that near the end of > yesterday's call, > > the TC reached consensus (not consensus by vote, but rather verbal > > consensus with no dissenting opinions expressed) that our current > > Figure 2-1 really represents a service orientation reference model. > > Furthermore, for some that was all we needed - while others > felt that > > we needed more (i.e. there was not consensus on this point, > nor do I > > expect that there would be given the 2 "camps" that have > formed). In > > my opinion, all viewpoints are valid for those that hold them - we > > just need a mechanism to reflect the consensus of the TC in > our work. > > > > So to this end, we decided that the best approach forward was to > > construct the 2 reference models described in my first > paragraph below > > (2 e-mails down), the second one building on the first. This would > > also allow us to keep the name of the TC as the SOA-RM TC, and not > > change it to the SO-RM (Service Orientation RM) TC, because we will > > ultimately produce a SOA RM. > > > > Speaking personally, I believe that this is an excellent approach - > > i.e. first building a foundation (service orientation), > then expanding > > on it for SOA. The intent of my "pulse check" proposal was to raise > > awareness that there were indeed 2 camps within the TC (and I will > > assert that it was this way from the very start), which it did. > > > > And so here we are. > > > > Joe > > > > Joseph Chiusano > > Booz Allen Hamilton > > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > > > > > > From: Sally St. Amand [mailto:sallystamand@yahoo.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:54 AM > > To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] New Name of Current Spec (Was RE: [soa-rm] > > Groups - SOA RM Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005 (Meeting Minutes June > > 01, 2005[1].doc) uploaded) > > > > Joe > > I had to leave the call a bit early so I may have missed a point. > > But right before I left Rebekah made, I thought, the point > that the TC > > does not have concensus and we should focus on gaining concensus > > around concepts rather than methods of graphical display or names. > > I do not believe we have concensus on concepts which is why I voted > > 'yes' on your ballot proposal. I believe we need more discussion to > > achieve concensus only then should we adopt a formal means > to display > > it or name it. > > Your efforts to give the discussion momentum are appreciated. > > Sally > > > > Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> wrote: > > Just to clarify, based on our discussion at the end of today's call: > > > > Our current spec will be renamed to SO-RM (Service Orientation > > Reference Model), and another will follow called SOA-RM > > (Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Model) which will > extend the > > SO-RM spec. > > > > And perhaps after that (within our TC, or perhaps within a > different > > TC) we can have a POA-RM (Process-Oriented Architecture Reference > > Model), which will extend the SOA-RM spec. > > > > Joe > > > > Joseph Chiusano > > Booz Allen Hamilton > > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: cbashioum@mitre.org [mailto:cbashioum@mitre.org] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:45 PM > > > To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > > > Subject: [soa-rm] Groups - SOA RM Meeting Minutes June 01, > > > 2005 (Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005[1].do! c) uploaded > > > > > > The document named SOA RM Meeting Minutes June 01, 2005 (Meeting > > > Minutes June 01, 2005[1].doc) has been submitted by Mr > Christopher > > > Bashioum to the OASIS SOA Reference Model TC document repository. > > > > > > Document Description: > > > Minutes for the Bi-Weekly teleconferenece call. > > > > > > View Document Details: > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/document.p > > > hp?document_id=12909 > > > > > > Download Document: > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.p > > > hp/12909/Meeting%20Minutes%20June%2001%2C%202005%5B1%5D.doc > > > > > > > > > PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email > > > application may be breaking the link into two pieces. > > > You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address > into the > > > address field of your web browser. > > > > > > -OASIS Open Administration > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]