[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Service Consumer in RM or not?
I am not so sure that a SO RM will be confusing if we come out with a SOA RA/RM at the same time. One particular large vendor has been talking about their product being focused on SO and not SOA. Michael At 03:52 PM 6/7/2005, Duane Nickull wrote: >Chiusano Joseph wrote: > >>- A Service Orientation Reference Model (SO RM) - that is, don't label >>this as "SOA RM" but rather "SO RM" >>- A SOA Reference Architecture (SOA RA) >> >>rather than a single SOA Reference Model (SOA RM). >Joseph: > >Our intent (as expressed in our charter) has always been to do this. >The only difference is the change of the name from SOA RM to SO RM. > >Pro of renaming to SO RM: > >- more accurate reflection of what it really is. > >Con of renaming to SO RM: > >- losing the correlation with SOA. We are trying to define SOA. If we >change the name, it may be perceived as defining something different which >means we are in the same place as we started when we finish. >- People may not reconcile the work with SOA which is the primary goal of >the TC > >If there is a desire to explore this further, I would ask that someone who >is a voting member please ask that this be put up for a web ballot. > >Duane
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]