Since I was the “note-taker” –
How do we move this forward?
Should I update the “meeting minutes”
to reflect that the whole group should be asked instead of specific
individuals?
I think that was the intent but specific
names were mentioned as a starting point.
Thanks,
/Prasanta
From: Sally St. Amand
[mailto:sallystamand@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 6:36
AM
To: SOA-RM
Subject: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting
Minutes for June 15
Duane asked that I post an email I sent to him on the list. It is
below.
Sally
Duane Nickull
<dnickull@adobe.com> wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005
10:34:00 -0700
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Meeting Minutes for June 15
To: "Sally St. Amand" <sallystamand@yahoo.com>
CC: Peter Brown <peter@justbrown.net>, Rebekah Metz
<metz_rebekah@bah.com>,
Joseph Chiusano <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Thank you Sally. These types of emails need to be sent to the open list
to maintain transparency.
Can you please repost to the list then we can discuss?
THanks
Duane
Sally St. Amand wrote:
> Duane
>
> I was looking over the minutes for our last TC concall. I do not think
> they accurately reflect what went on at the meeting.
>
> With respect to to the paragraph
>
> *Item 6:*
>
> Sub item 1 (SC part of core RM??) Peter: Use the procedure agreed
> today to discuss about the issue regarding SC. Peter will work with
> Joseph and Rebekah to derive wording, then propose vote via list server.
>
>
>
> My recollection was you asked that a notice be sent out on the list to
> solicit people to formulate the proposal. You did not say it
> explicitly, but the message I got was that the whole group would be
> asked who wanted to further address a sub-issue.
>
>
>
> I have a view on this issue and would like to participate in
> specifying it not just respond to an up or down vote. To this end I am
> copying Peter, Joe & Rebekah. And I suspect others have a view they
> want to express.
>
>
>
> Sally
>
>