[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Revision and Clarifications of some PDs (reactions to JoeChuisano's comments)
Re: 27 -> Hmm - I think just "agreed" is fine. It doesn't always have to be "explicit", however it may have to be specific IMO. Otherwise, we will end up with a huge set of artifacts for every service call. Thanks Duane Peter F Brown wrote: > Joe: > > In 27, you are right: contract must specify that "something" has been > explicitly agreed between a set of entities. The clue to the possible > wording is in the PD for the previous Isuue, N° 26 "...When a specific > set of entities accept such a policy, a contract is usually > established.". I will re-word, and re-submit. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]