OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm] [soa-ra] Notes from telcon on 2/1/06


Sorry I couldn't make it today. I'm in Lisbon, speaking at the Microsoft
Government Leaders Forum (where I've been talking to guys about SOA-RM and
its value in the eGovernment space...) 

Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank McCabe [mailto:frank.mccabe@us.fujitsu.com] 
Sent: 01 February 2006 18:15
To: SOA-RM
Subject: [soa-rm] [soa-ra] Notes from telcon on 2/1/06

Since this was not an official formal meeting, we did not take formal
official minutes :)

However, a summary of the results of the meeting is:

Attendees:

Theo Beack
Duane Nickull
Joe Chiusano
Michael Stiefel
Al Brown
Danny Thornton
Greg Kohring
Ken Laskey
Jeff Estefan
Frank McCabe

The name of the new committee will be: The OASIS Service Oriented
Architecture Reference Architecture Sub-TC

The purpose will be: To develop one or more Reference Architectures for SOA
based on the current SOA RM (versions 1 and later as appropriate).

The deliverables will be: One or more specification documents containing
descriptions of the Reference Architecture(s).

The chair will be: Frank McCabe

Process:

We will use an official OASIS email list, together with a WIKI and a folder
in KAVI for documents and other artifacts associated with the work.
We will have regular telephone conferences, alternating with the SOA RM TC
every other week. (I.e. every other Wednesday, on those weeks where the SOA
RM TC is not meeting)

Technical Discussions:

There was a wide ranging discussion about many topics; including issues
about the scope of the RA, whether it includes POA, BPM etc.  
how concrete it should be, whether issues involving migration from stovepipe
systems to service markets was included, and so on.

There was some thought about what an Reference Architecture actually is.
This will probably evolve some, but in essence it seems that it is an
architectural design pattern; with, of course, a focus for us on
architecting SOAs.

We will need to evolve a set of requirements. This process will be critical
in determining if we need more than one RA.




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]