[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Proposed resolution for issue 509
+1 for the glossary option even though it states the obvious. If one person had an issue with it, I am sure others will. Michael At 03:44 PM 4/10/2006, Peter F Brown wrote: >I'd go for the glossary option in order to disambiguate > >-Peter > >-----Original Message----- >From: Frank McCabe [mailto:frank.mccabe@us.fujitsu.com] >Sent: 10 April 2006 06:58 >To: SOA-RM >Subject: [soa-rm] Proposed resolution for issue 509 > >The issue reads: "What do you mean by function?" > >Function, of course, has a mathematical definition. However, we use the term >in the RM to refer to an operational capability: something that can have a >real world effect if it is applied. > >Proposed resolution: > >Either no change to text on the basis that function is a commonly understood >term in the industry and we do not believe we are using it differently. > >Or, add a glossary entry: > >Function: an operational capability that when activated will result in a >real world effect.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]