Re: [soa-rm] Proposed Resolutions - Issue #530, 531, 533, 534, 558, 559, 563

[Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>]

530: I'll let the English fight this one out.

531: ditto

533: +1 w/ 559

534: +1

558: +1 (and update for whatever result of this round of edits is  
called)

559: +1 w/ 553

563: +1 on redundancy.  How about "To this point, this description of  
SOA has not mentioned ..."?

On Apr 25, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Peter F Brown wrote:

> Although these are my own issues, I think they are so basic (typo  
> and minor editorial) that they should be able to be accepted  
> without discussion.
>
> I would propose therefore, in the absence of any comment on the  
> list before this Friday COB indicating to the contrary, that these  
> Issues be considered by the TC as resolved and closed as indicated.
>
> Peter
>
> -------------
> Peter F Brown
> Chair, CEN eGovernment Focus Group
> Senior Policy Adviser on eGovernment, Austrian Federal Chancellery
> Co-Editor, OASIS SOA Reference Model
> Lecturer at XML Summer School
> ---
> Office:
> peter.brown@bka.gv.at
> +43 1 53115 2595
> www.bka.gv.at
> Personal:
> http://public.xdi.org/=Peter.Brown
> www.XMLbyStealth.net
> www.xmlsummerschool.com
>
>