[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] [For Issue #525] RE: [soa-rm] Groups - Proposed SOA-RM Relationship Names (SOA-RM Relationships Names.xls) uploaded
Jeff: I actually worked on a subsequent
rendition of this which incorporated our W3C work. The document is entitled “interpreting
concept maps” and could use finishing. Contact me if you want a copy. Duane ******************************* From: Colleagues, With respect to the concept map diagrams in the SOA-RM spec,
why don't we just keep it simple and adopt the same "standard" that
was used in the W3C WSA (Web Services Architecture) in which concepts are shown
as boxes and relationships between concepts are shown as labeled arcs (with
arrows). A very short description is provided in Sect 2.2.3 of the WSA. See: or Perhaps Frank can provide additional insight since he served
on the W3C's WSA team. Then later on, either under the auspices of this
TC or perhaps the Semantic Execution TC, a formal ontology can be
developed. I hate to see us loose momentum on ratification of a pretty
darn good SOA-RM spec as it's shaping up right now. Just a thought... - Jeff, JPL |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]