[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Groups - Draft Minutes-SOA-RM TC Mtg, 13 May 2015.doc uploaded
I obviously missed an interesting discussion. Some quick thoughts: - from SOA-RM:
There is additional discussion in the SOA-RM - from SOA-RAF
There is additional discussion in the SOA-RAF - An entity has a behavior and the behavior may be to follow a process. The entity needs to be able to respond if the process cannot be followed. - My interpretation of this is a single entity can declare a policy without a second entity being immediately involved, but a contract requires at least two entities to agree on a set of conditions and/or constraints that make up the contract. Whoever declares a policy is responsible for its enforcement; participants in a contract typically identify a third party to enforce the contract, e.g. per the laws and processes of some identified jurisdiction. I am on board with Michael’s paper up to the numbered list on the second page. I see where the complications arise but I need to read this more carefully to identify where I think we part in current understanding. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S F510 phone: 703-983-7934 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]