Fwd: [soa-rm] Groups - Draft - Minutes-SOA-RM TC Mtg, 18 February 2016.d

Begin forwarded message:

From: Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Groups - Draft - Minutes-SOA-RM TC Mtg, 18 February 2016.doc uploaded
Date: February 28, 2016 at 10:11:07 AM EST
To: Martin Smith <bfc.mclean@gmail.com>

Fine. My question was whether the jumbled phrase was meant to stay.

Rex - please clean up and upload.

Michael - if you have anything to add, please get it to Rex so he can bring to close.

Others on the list - thoughts?

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S F510 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508

On Feb 27, 2016, at 11:33 PM, Martin Smith <bfc.mclean@gmail.com> wrote:

Ken -- I thought that phrase was jumbled and omitted it from the revision. I thought what I left in that para and elsewhere captured the idea of varying peer-to-peer vs permanent super/subordinate relationships between services.

I am happy to go along with whatever you think is clear at this point.

Thanks,

Martin

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote:
Sentence in question:
Martin asked Michael agreed that it was appropriate to characterize a particular service as implementing the SOA design pattern or architecture, assuming the service observes the requirements and constraints specified by the architecture. an Sarchitecture is that subordinate to the overall architecture?

Your previous response may just be intended as a replacement for the whole paragraph, but what really seemed hanging was the phrase “an Sarchitecture is that subordinate to the overall architecture?”.

Seems like an incomplete cleanup of a thought.

Ken

On Feb 27, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Martin Smith <bfc.mclean@gmail.com> wrote:

Umm--Ken. I did not understand your last message. Was it supposed to point to a revised version? Not clear what you want me to do.

Thanks,

Martin

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote:
Martin,

I think this clarifies (and better reflects my recollection of the discussion) the sentence after the one I was questioning. I suggest keeping this edit but can you look at the sentence that begins “Martin asked Michael…”

Thanks,

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S F510 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508

On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Martin Smith <bfc.mclean@gmail.com> wrote:

Michael said that one should not say something is an "SOA service" since SOA is an architecture. He agreed with Martin's suggestion that it would be OK to characterize a particular service as implementing the SOA design pattern or architecture, providing that the service observes the requirements and constraints of the architecture.

--
Martin F Smith, Principal
BFC Consulting, LLC
McLean, Va 22102
703 506-0159
703 389-3224 mobile

--
Martin F Smith, Principal
BFC Consulting, LLC
McLean, Va 22102
703 506-0159
703 389-3224 mobile

soa-rm message