Re: [tag-discuss] Suitability for automation (Was: a few questions to kick-off the discussion)

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 21/11/06, david_marston@us.ibm.com <david_marston@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I should elaborate a little on what I said before.
>
> We should scope this to apply to any test regime where the
> **management** of test cases is amenable to automation, even if
> some or all of the test cases require a manual step.

In which case I'd ask for a definition of management please.
I think we are in agreement so far, just working out terminology?



> The test assertions might make a claim about the results that can
> only be evaluated manually with current technology, e.g., a drawn
> line "connects" point A to point B.

Which brings in tolerances?
'Connects +-2cm etc.

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk