[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tag-discuss] Keep It Simple: some options
On 07/12/06, Durand, Jacques R. <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > (a) a TC charter that only targets a TA guideline as unique deliverable, and > explicitly prohibit any work on a formal representation (e.g. XML mark-up). > Any intent to do other deliverables beyond this guideline, after being done > with the guideline, would require a re-chartering of the TC. -1 to this. Is flying to the moon explicitly prohibited too :-) > > (b) a TC charter that targets a TA guideline as first deliverable > (mandatory), and also allows the TC - should the TC consider it useful - to > produce another deliverable (optional) containing a TA representation or > mark-up. The TC may also decide (vote) at that time on the purpose of this > mark-up, as it may impact its design. E.g. may decide that requirements for > this mark-up are just for publishing concerns. +0, perhaps caveated by the duration of the TC? I.e. only if we can do it in the allotted time? I think the last two sentances are redundant? > > (c) same as (b), but the 2nd deliverable - the TA mark-up or whatever > representation - is not an option, I.e. it is understood the TC is supposed > to produce it. -1. Charter needs to be explicit and measurable (eating our own dogfood) > > In all 3 above, the TC must focus on a guideline in a first phase, that > excludes a mark-up or formal TA representation. It may work on a mark-up in > second phase, and this deliverable will be distinct (a different document) > from the guideline deliverable. Only, it is easier to do so when going from > (a) to (c): -1 Too many conditional clauses. > > - in (a), Re-chartering the TC to extend its scope is a bit more paperwork, > and requires 2/3 majority to pass. Also needs be done with same IPR mode. -1 > > - in (b), TC may decide either to NOT do the mark-up (simple majority vote), > or to do it, after producing the guideline deliverable. -1 > > - in (c), TC is committed to work on a mark-up after being done with 1st > deliverable. (I know that some folks have mentioned they consider this an > important output) I guess that on completion of the initial deliverable, our opinions may have changed? I'd rather leave further development until clearer views are available at that time? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]