[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tag] Draft write-up for Anatomy of a TA section
A few comments. (note: it would be very helpful to have
this write-up in an editable form, rather than pdf) We need to define ‘test’ and
its relationship to TA and be careful that we don’t equate the two. Bullet 1: “The specification requirement(s)
that it intends to verify” Don’t use the word ‘verify’
- too many definitions of what verifies means. In fact, the TA doesn’t
verify the requirement, the test verifies it. Suggest, replacing with ‘that
it addresses’ Bullet 2: suggest replacing text in ( )
with ‘(the target of the test)’. It is better to have a
positive statement than negative. Also, an object doesn’t fail the
TA, it fails the test that is the instantiation of the TA. --Lynne From: Durand, Jacques
R. [mailto:jdurand@us.fujitsu.com] Authored by Serm and myself, although Serm has not seen this
latest version as he is traveling right now. For comments. -Jacques |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]