tag message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Final agenda for F2F
- From: "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
- To: <tag@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:05:41 -0800
(same as the one on
TAG TC page event schedule - with suggestions from last conf
call)
- missing: a
short recap early afternoon of most prominent decisions in morning, for those
dialing-in.
Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC F2F meeting,
Dec 6-7
========================================================
General objective: determine the content and
structure of a complete draft
of the test assertions guideline
document.
======================================================================
Day 1: Thursday 6th, AM:
======================================================================
1. Kick-off (15mn):
- Review of the agenda and proposed updates.
- F2F logistics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Terminology / glossary section: review of
material on wiki (1h)
- review and refine definition of main glossary
entries.
- "informal" definitions of related notions: spec
requirement, test metadata, conf clause.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Administration (30mn)
- review of current alternate meeting solution,
update on OASIS process in this area.
- new "informational document" status for
non-specifications in OASIS, and their delivery track.
- review wiki cooperation.
- other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Review of prior art (1h15)
Review of external work (OASIS, W3C, WS-I...) done
on modeling/representing TAs for
particular specifications. What was the value these
groups saw in TAs?
A series of short presentations (10mn max) and
discussion.
======================================================================
Day 1: Thursday 6th, PM:
======================================================================
5. First Editorial pass on the structure options
for the guideline doc: (1h)
- Sync-up on the general editorial objectives we
have for the Guideline, (e.g. size of doc,
editorial style & audience) as well as general
position (are there cases
where TA step unnecessary and guideline
unnecessary? etc.)
- do a high-level (not in-depth) review of the
components we have, how they fit-in.
(no in-depth review of their content.)
Questions like: how much space for each part, how
much space for examples, quick assessment
on how much work remains for each part.
- editorial format of "best
practices".
6. Review of the "Intro / rationale" section. (1h)
7. Review of the TA Anatomy section. (1h)
8. Treatment of referred - or secondary - specs,
pre-requisites and others. (45mn)
======================================================================
Day 2: Friday 7th, AM:
======================================================================
9. Second iteration on the "Intro / rationale"
section, and follow-up on glossary. (1h)
10. Second iteration on the TA Anatomy section.
Focus on examples (1h)
11. Best practices section or equivalent. (1h)
======================================================================
Day 2: Friday 7th, PM:
======================================================================
12. Resume on the most critical or unfinished
morning item(s). (30mn)
13. Review of examples material, cross-section.
(1h)
14. external related material and level of exposure
in guideline (1h)
- UML
- ADL
- Schematron
- RDF
15. Discussion on how to approach the XML mark-up
next step. (30mn)
16. Wrap-up and action items review
(15mn)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]