[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: comments on TAG 0.4
Comments on TAG draft 0.4 1. Please add Tim Boland (NIST) to list of Contributors. Serm Kulvatunyou is no longer at NIST 2. Abstract: "...mandatory and optional components..." Perhaps we need a conformance clause to explain that if you want to implement the guideline and create a TA then you need to implement the 'mandatory' components. 3. Section 1.3 Coverage Analysis What is the relationship between the TA and coverage? I have lots of problems with this section - it seems more about test suites and test than TAs. Much of what is here relates coverage and test suites. Typically, if you don't have the TAs, you don't have tests. What would help is a statement of what this section is trying to achieve (relate). 4. Contradiction? - Sec 1.1 What is a Test Assertion and Section called Testability In Sec. 1.1 "...Each is an independent testable statement..." and "sometimes an assertion is included which is not testable" It seems that we define TA to be testable and then say it sometimes isn't testable. Also, in Testability "The test assertion should be testable". So, is a TA testable or not. I believe that the whole purpose of writing the TA is that it is testable. regards Lynne
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]