tag message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Comments on Section 3, and proposal to split the Prereq subsection
- From: "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
- To: <tag@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:21:58 -0700
See my comments in
the wiki ( tagged [jacques]) for the beginning of Section 3.
My suggestion is to
split the previous "Prerequisite" section in two, and to move (part of) the
Prerequisite section just after 3.1 "Complex Predicates".
The subsections at
the beginning of Section 3 become:
3.1 Complex
Predicates
3.2
Prerequisites
suggest to move the core of
"prerequisite" section here, while leaving the more advanced case of
prerequisites (with references to other test assertions) after the "Test
Assertions for Properties" section. Reason: now that prerequisites include any
kind of precondition - not just refs to other TAs - they are a very common TA
feature (e.g. "context" in Schematron, "precondition" in WS-I). Most
prerequisites will just be "conditions" that do NOT refer to other TAs. Just
after the Complex Predicates section is a good place to introduce simple
prerequisites based on the example in 3.1, and to contrast with the "complex
predicate" solution.
3.3 Test Assertions for
Properties
3.4 Prerequisites Referring to
Other Test Assertions
Here the
special case of prereqs that refer to other TAs, is handled. Must be AFTER " 3.3
TA for Properties" subsection, because makes use of these new
TAs.
See in the wiki how that
flows.
Jacques
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]