[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: PDF: TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf
Here is the same in PDF 2009/1/15 Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>: > The attached file, which I've temporarily called > "0-9-9-9-in-progress-1", seems to me to > have all the work we have completed so far. If we need another 'draft > of this draft' prior > to any TC vote we could call it "0-9-9-9-in-progress-2" and so on. > > Would we wait until we have decided on a committee draft before asking Dmitry to > check it again (or those parts which have changed since last time anyway)? > > Could this be the draft we vote on whether or not to approve it as a > commitee draft? > > I take it it has to go through the process: > > committee draft (voted) > Dmitry's checking > any changes > committee draft (voted) > committee spec (voted) > public review spec (voted) > committee spec (if no changes after review) > > [if changes after review then > the whole cycle maybe starts again] > > Best regards > > Steve > > -- > Stephen D. Green > > Document Engineering Services Ltd > > > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice > -- Stephen D. Green Document Engineering Services Ltd http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]