[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [tax] e-gov tc
Michael, I had a contact with John myself last week discussing the liaison. Because I am participating in this TC John ad I agreed that I would do the liaison for the time being. But perhaps there are others who want to join in. I certainly cannot visit all their face to face meetings. Perhaps it is possible to make a roster. Harm Jan -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com [mailto:Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com] Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2003 14:54 Aan: tax@lists.oasis-open.org Onderwerp: [tax] [egov] OASIS E-GOV TC - DELIVERABLES Tax XML TC, I thought you might be interested that we've been listed in the e-Government standards matrix as an entity responsible for the Tax aspects. I believe this puts us on the critical path for the success of e-Government TC. We will need to establish a formal liaison with e-Government TC even though we have individuals participating in both Tax and e-Government TCs. Thanks, Michael. ----- Forwarded by Michael Roytman/Construction/Vertexinc on 03/10/2003 08:50 AM ----- |---------+------------------------------> | | john.borras@e-envoy| | | .gsi.gov.uk | | | | | | 03/08/2003 06:36 AM| | | | |---------+------------------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Diane.Lewis@usdoj.gov | | cc: egov@lists.oasis-open.org | | Subject: [egov] OASIS E-GOV TC - DELIVERABLES | >----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------| Diane Thanks for an interesting discussion yesterday. It set me thinking about what is the ultimate output from the TC, hence I'm copying in the whole membership on this note. We talked a lot about the need for matrices of services and standards, and I believe that is ultimately what we should as a TC be aiming to produce and publish - a set of matrices for Services/Functions, Infrastructures etc that show for each particular aspect of e-government our recommended standards. This would be invaluable to governments, particularly those that are new to the e-government work, and those communities of governments like us in the EU who are looking to join up on service delivery. Clearly we cannot mandate these standards but it would send clear messages to governments around the world, and their IT suppliers, which are the standards they should give serious consideration to. On that basis I've sketched out a matrix for your Services focus along the lines of what we discussed yesterday, and one for what I'm calling Infrastructures. This is a first cut and we can develop it and add to it as we go. I will be suggesting to the TC on Wednesday that we need another Sub-committee to address the infrastructure issues. The role of both these SCs would in effect be to populate these matrices, and that of course will require looking at what's the current standard if any , whose doing what, where are the gaps that need new work and instigating that work, etc as we discussed yesterday. I see the role of the Best Practices SC to then produce case studies on as many of these aspects as possible and they can be cross-referenced in the matrices. The ebXML/Web Services SC would feed into many aspects of the matrices both as solutions to services and also aspects of infrastructure. As I said I'll add this to the agenda for the TC meeting on Wednesday as I think it would help us all if we had an agreed vision of the end point of our work. Views in the interim from all would be welcomed. Apologies that this is only in Word format but I haven't got Open Office on my laptop. Regards, John (See attached file: e-gov TC Matrix.doc)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]