[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: AW: [tax] OASIS CIQ Standards
As a matter of fact, I have downloaded the CIQ files just an hour or two ago, meaning that I am indeed prepared to look at it. I have also communicated to the members of the OECD STF task team that I would like CIQ schemas to be on the agenda of a meeting we are going to have in Bonn on July 28/29. Is anybody out there having "some practical experience of CIQ" who would like to join us on this occasion? Arndt -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andy Greener [mailto:andy@gid.co.uk] Gesendet am: Freitag, 4. Juli 2003 16:19 An: tax@lists.oasis-open.org Betreff: Re: [tax] OASIS CIQ Standards At 11:00 am +0200 4/7/03, H.J.M. van Burg wrote: >Try to give this discussion the right subject. You're absolutely correct! Thank you Mr Chairman :-) >Looking at the possibilities here we should seriously consider adopting CIQ >standards for tax purposes. Perhaps the TASC could take the lead here and >try to get with an answer: >Can we propose CIQ standards for the standard in electronic data interchange >with regard to tax-filing an perhaps inter agency traffic? CIQ is I think one of the component standards that we should be aiming to be compatible with, but I would hesitate to say that Tax XML should adopt CIQ outright (for instance, if a jurisdiction has good reason to use a local addressing or naming standard for intra-jurisdictional transactions then mandating CIQ would be a major barrier to the adoption of Tax XML, whereas a looser coupling would enable all three standards to be accommodated). Before we start trying to build something out of the components (ours and other people's, like CIQ) I think we should get our framework and glue in place and then think about our components. This is why I think we should be looking at the likes of UBL/ebXML first, and why I'm happy that in the meantime CIQ and UBL are talking. >With regards to the STF schema. Could CIQ be incorporated? This would be a very good exercise to gain some experience with CIQ and to see how something like STF, which pre-dates our standards efforts, could be componentized (sorry, horrible word!). Would Arndt be prepared to look at this, perhaps in collaboration with someone who has some practical experience of CIQ? >What sort of changes should be made to CIQ to fit completely (if any)? >Who is willing to act as liaison to the CIQ tc? I suggest someone from the TASC, but if Alex or John want to do it then that's ok too, especially if John is already an observer in that group. Andy -- Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 andy@gid.co.uk Fax: +44 118 958 9005 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tax/members/leave_workgroup.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]