[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Issue 13 (General)- Technology Management Framework - need toinclude Core Standards Set? - open
Yep,
I think giving examples of profiles of standard X or Y would offer more value,
but they are just examples, since there are country or industry specific contexts
for them in most cases so they may not suit all situations. Cheers Colin From: Greenaway Nigel
[mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] I'm
happy that we address this aspect later. Nig: I’m taking your different points as separate issues. John has already commented: “It has always been
my intention to address this point once we have got the Primer out of the
way. I would like to set up a sub-committee to produce the core set of
standards and then we can issue them as a CN or possible look for some other
body to take them on and maintain them. And in the same vein I want to do some
work on common data standards but again that’s for later. So can I
propose we defer anything further on these aspects for now?” My own view (as TC member, not as an editor): I agree that we
should defer for now. I’m not convinced (any more, although I’m probably an
apostate on this) of the value of lists of core standards – our emphasis ought
to be shifted towards lists of core functional issues that standards ought to
address. Standards may, do, evolve in light of technological change, but core
functional requirements (defined in the broadest sense) tend to persist more
and are less prone to updating and currency problems. Other comments? Peter From:
Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] There are
some items that do not have a home indicated for them in the document. They
probably belong in Part III(d). and will probably be separate committee Notes
but probably need to be discussed by the group (perhaps initially on the call
later this week?).as The areas
that come to my mind (there may be more) are: 1. Core Standards Set. One of the
CSTransform papers identifies a long tail of standards when various Ifs are
surveyed. It would seem sensible for us to at least have a stab at defining the
core set. Possibly, this could be done alongside and take cognisance of the UK
Standards survey that is currently being undertaken. CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you. ==== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]