[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tgf] Issue - Conceptual - Identity Management, legal barriers,lines 978ff - closed
Fair
point. So
the bit you would want to see changed is: 'centuries
of piecemeal approaches taken by public administrations' to
something like
'centuries of piecemeal
approaches taken by public administrations and more recently by the private
sector' ..keeping
the notion that both public and more recently private approaches have all been
piecemeal..:-) Cheers Colin
From: Andy Hopkirk
[mailto:andy.hopkirk@gmail.com] A thought on the identity management discussion
below.... At least in the UK, the notion of citizen-centric identity
management is being put about (again), as part of the (i) re-localisation
political agenda and (ii) by the 'open society' gang as part of their
citizen responsibility/ my control of my data agenda. [The concept runs
thus... I control my identity record in a public or private 'record store' and
give permisssions to others - inc. government - to use that up to date identity
for purposes only I can approve of (or not, as the case may be)]. Begs the question in my mind to maybe not be too definitive
about identity management as being something that will always
be only within government's remit to control and only in harmony
with the long established legal precedents... because change happens, sometimes
quickly... Andy On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Peter F Brown <peter@peterfbrown.com> wrote: Nig: OK, what I have now is: “Although the advent of
e Government held out the promise of significant simplification of identity
management - bringing service improvement gains for the citizen and efficiency
savings for the Government - significant barriers remain. These include legal
barriers that have grown up over centuries of piecemeal approaches taken by
public administrations and put in place often to protect individuals from the
effects of equally piecemeal processes. As such the impact of any changes must
be considered very carefully.” Does this capture it? Peter From: Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com]
Line 980.
I think it is worth
elaboration on the ‘significant
barriers’ a little. I suggest adding a further couple of sentences:- “There
may be legal barriers that have been created over time by the piecemeal approaches taken over centuries
of silo-based activity.
Many of these will have been put in place to protect individuals and the
impact of and any changes to them must be considered very carefully ” Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44
(0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056,
Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its
contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu
Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and
amended or that it is virus-free. CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you. ==== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]