[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tgf] Issue 4 - RFI - Reference to existing/other standards and frameworks in TGF
Colin: I think the reference to OIX is probably the most appropriate – in its mission statement it sets as goals to ‘standardize identity interactions’ and ‘eliminate the need for pairwise legal agreements’. I think those statements are central to what we are saying about TGF generally… Peter From: Colin Wallis [mailto:Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz] +1 to that. The EIF is a better 'wholesome' example. Who was that mastermind who drafted that?:-) More frameworks? There's lots going on in the identity space.. Look under ICAM for a snapshot of this space Then, as one of several Trust Framework Providers to enable that, look at: http://www.kantarainitiative.org/ ..and the plethora of trust federation/framework related initiatives you can see from the title of various of the work groups.. ..and Kantara would be one of a number of member Trust Framework Providers who are part of this umbrella organisation http://openidentityexchange.org/ like SWIFT or whatever it is is for banking, and 'whatever-it-is' for credit cards, and …. Cheers Colin From: Greenaway Nigel [mailto:Nig.Greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com] Hi Peter, I agree that the EIF should be referenced. I suggest that we don’t reference the UK e-GIF (unless its to say that it was the first and others have built upon it) as it is horribly out of date. There is a public standards survey that aims to agree/refine an updated set of standards that government has built being currently undertaken and a draft document that will replace the ‘policy’ part of the e-GIF has been drafted and is awaiting ministerial approval (and probably a public consultation). Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: nig.greenaway@uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] Hi: One issue that we discussed on the editorial call last Thursday concerns the TGF relationship with – and particularly reference to – other relevant works, whether standards, frameworks, etc. We are concerned in this issue with general textual references, examples to cite, etc. This issue is not the same as the issue 13, concerned with including a ‘Core Standards Set’, which is being addressed separately. We agreed in principle to only reference high-level frameworks rather than specific and detailed technical standards. To this end, this is an open ‘Request for Information’ for TC members to indicate which frameworks they feel ought to be referenced in the TGF Primer. Some obvious examples are the US Justice Reference Architecture, the EU’s EIF, the UK’s eGIF or Austria’s PDÖ, the US’s FEA (now morphing into the UGEAF), etc. We don’t want to overload the Primer with too many examples but we do want to show a fairly representative sample and indicate how they relate to the work we are doing. So, open for comments Cheers, Peter Peter F Brown Independent Consultant Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies Blog pensivepeter.wordpress.com LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/pensivepeter Twitter @pensivepeter P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA Tel: +1.310.694.2278 ==== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]